Comments on: Wisdom of Crowds and Email http://eccobay.wordpress.com/2006/04/20/wisdom-of-crowds-and-email/ Online Marketing, Internet Start-Ups, and Investing Thu, 22 Jan 2009 14:16:26 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: Internet Marketing India http://eccobay.wordpress.com/2006/04/20/wisdom-of-crowds-and-email/#comment-4710 Internet Marketing India Mon, 30 Jul 2007 14:05:28 +0000 https://eccobay.wordpress.com/2006/04/20/wisdom-of-crowds-and-email/#comment-4710 David, Excellent insight into a matter that one usually spends time thinking about but doesn't address as often. I also agree with giving credit where it's due, but this is assuming that the person who receives all the feedback is unbiased. <a href="http://www.pragmites.com/" rel="nofollow">Internet Marketing India</a> David,
Excellent insight into a matter that one usually spends time thinking about but doesn’t address as often.
I also agree with giving credit where it’s due, but this is assuming that the person who receives all the feedback is unbiased.

Internet Marketing India

]]> By: eccobay http://eccobay.wordpress.com/2006/04/20/wisdom-of-crowds-and-email/#comment-1810 eccobay Tue, 17 Apr 2007 06:22:27 +0000 https://eccobay.wordpress.com/2006/04/20/wisdom-of-crowds-and-email/#comment-1810 @TJones - I think giving credit where credit is due is important in this type of methodology. Ideally the solution to this problem would be simple, where the person who is aggregating the feedback is honest enough to properly attirbute credit when everything is said and done. @TJones – I think giving credit where credit is due is important in this type of methodology. Ideally the solution to this problem would be simple, where the person who is aggregating the feedback is honest enough to properly attirbute credit when everything is said and done.

]]> By: TJones http://eccobay.wordpress.com/2006/04/20/wisdom-of-crowds-and-email/#comment-683 TJones Tue, 23 Jan 2007 15:09:36 +0000 https://eccobay.wordpress.com/2006/04/20/wisdom-of-crowds-and-email/#comment-683 One disadvantage of this method is that the posters don't get any credit for their ideas. One reason people respond to these "mass emails" is that they get visibility for providing good ideas. If everyone is bcc'd and summaries are anonymous, then that incentive disappears. Do you have any ideas for reintroducing credit without "tainting" the responses. One disadvantage of this method is that the posters don’t get any credit for their ideas. One reason people respond to these “mass emails” is that they get visibility for providing good ideas. If everyone is bcc’d and summaries are anonymous, then that incentive disappears.

Do you have any ideas for reintroducing credit without “tainting” the responses.

]]> By: Liam @ Web 2.5 Blog http://eccobay.wordpress.com/2006/04/20/wisdom-of-crowds-and-email/#comment-8 Liam @ Web 2.5 Blog Fri, 02 Jun 2006 17:17:24 +0000 https://eccobay.wordpress.com/2006/04/20/wisdom-of-crowds-and-email/#comment-8 I reference this post at http://web2dot5.blogspot.com/2006/06/web-25-eliminate-e-meetings.html (Trackback didn't seem to work.) I reference this post at
http://web2dot5.blogspot.com/2006/06/web-25-eliminate-e-meetings.html

(Trackback didn’t seem to work.)

]]> By: Web 2.5 : The Always-On-You Web http://eccobay.wordpress.com/2006/04/20/wisdom-of-crowds-and-email/#comment-7 Web 2.5 : The Always-On-You Web Fri, 02 Jun 2006 17:14:48 +0000 https://eccobay.wordpress.com/2006/04/20/wisdom-of-crowds-and-email/#comment-7 <strong>Eliminate E-meetings, Collaborate Better...</strong> In the context of peer-to-peer wikis, a dicussion/chat mechanism could provide a "deferred reveal" feature...... Eliminate E-meetings, Collaborate Better…

In the context of peer-to-peer wikis, a dicussion/chat mechanism could provide a “deferred reveal” feature……

]]>